Hey there! Today we’re going to compare the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 thermal optics in a detailed video by 4MR Ranch. This video covers everything from the specifications, price points, and exterior design to battery setup, user-friendliness, general similarities, negative points, and even provides comparison footage. The ATN ThOR 4 boasts a 4.5-18x magnification and a 384×288 sensor, while the Pulsar Thermion XM50 offers a 5.5-22x magnification and a 40×240 sensor. We’ll explore various features such as video recording, customizable reticles, color palettes, and rangefinders, and analyze their battery life, display resolution, and even their performance in different environmental conditions. So let’s dive right into this thermal showdown and find out which one comes out on top!
ATN ThOR 4 vs Pulsar Thermion XM50: A Comprehensive Comparison
Thermal optics are becoming increasingly popular among hunters and nighttime outdoor enthusiasts. In this comprehensive comparison article, we will be exploring two popular thermal optics: the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50. We will cover various aspects of these optics, including specifications, price points, exterior design, battery setup and life, media storage, user-friendliness, general similarities, negative points, and comparison footage. So, let’s dive in and find out which one might be the best fit for your needs.
Magnification and Sensor
One of the most important specifications to consider when choosing a thermal optic is the magnification. The ATN ThOR 4 offers a magnification range of 4.5-18x, while the Pulsar Thermion XM50 boasts a slightly higher range of 5.5-22x. The difference in magnification range might be crucial for long-range shots or detailed observation.
Another important aspect to consider is the sensor. The ATN ThOR 4 features a 384×288 sensor, while the Pulsar Thermion XM50 has a 640×480 sensor. Higher sensor resolution can contribute to clearer and more detailed images. However, it is worth noting that the base model we are comparing here does not include the higher resolution sensors available from both manufacturers.
Price is an important factor for many consumers when choosing between products. The ATN ThOR 4 can be purchased for around $2,700, while the Pulsar Thermion XM50 is priced at approximately $3,800. It is essential to consider how much you are willing to invest in a thermal optic and whether the additional features and capabilities of the Pulsar Thermion XM50 justify the higher price.
The design and physical features of a thermal optic can greatly influence its usability and compatibility with different firearms and setups. Both the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 have 30mm tubes, allowing for easy attachment and compatibility with traditional rings and mounts. The ATN ThOR 4 weighs in at 2.2 pounds, while the Pulsar Thermion XM50 is slightly lighter at 1.98 pounds.
The Pulsar Thermion XM50 resembles a more traditional rifle scope in terms of its design, while the ATN ThOR 4 has adopted a more modern and streamlined appearance. The choice between the two designs ultimately comes down to personal preference and the aesthetic you prefer for your firearm setup.
Battery Setup and Life
Battery life is a crucial consideration when using electronic optics, as you want to ensure your optic provides enough power for long periods in the field without constant worry or interruptions. The ATN ThOR 4 features an internal battery that can be charged through the outside of the scope. It offers an impressive battery life of up to 18 hours, providing peace of mind for extended use.
On the other hand, the Pulsar Thermion XM50 utilizes an external battery, which can be easily removed and charged separately. The external battery drains prior to switching to the internal battery, providing approximately 6 hours of runtime in total. It’s worth noting that the Pulsar Thermion XM50 only includes one extra battery, which may be limiting for some users, especially considering its higher price point.
Recording and capturing your hunting or outdoor experiences is a desirable feature for many thermal optic users. The ATN ThOR 4 offers the option to record videos directly onto a removable SD card, with support for cards ranging from 4GB to 64GB in size. The ability to have additional storage cards allows for extended recording and easy transfer of footage to other devices.
In contrast, the Pulsar Thermion XM50 utilizes internal storage, providing 16GB of built-in memory. While this eliminates the need for additional storage devices, it may come with limitations in terms of capacity and transferring footage. Consider your preferences and requirements for video storage when choosing between these two options.
Ease of use and intuitive controls can greatly enhance the overall experience of using a thermal optic. Both the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 offer user-friendly interfaces and controls. They feature similar functions and settings, including customizable reticles, various color palettes, and built-in rangefinders.
The ATN ThOR 4 has been praised for its intuitive menu system and user-friendly interface, making it easy to navigate through the different settings and features. The Pulsar Thermion XM50 also offers a straightforward user interface, with accessible controls for adjusting reticles and selecting different color palettes.
Ultimately, the choice between these two optics comes down to personal preference, as both offer user-friendly features and controls.
When comparing the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50, several key similarities can be observed. Both optics offer video recording capabilities, allowing users to capture their hunting or outdoor experiences in real-time. They also feature customizable reticles, enabling users to choose from a variety of reticle options to suit their preferences and shooting style.
Another similarity between the two optics is the availability of different color palettes, providing options for different lighting conditions and optimized viewing. Additionally, both optics include built-in rangefinders, which can be helpful for estimating distances to targets.
These shared features highlight the comparable capabilities and versatility of the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50, making them suitable choices for various hunting and outdoor applications.
While both the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 offer impressive features and capabilities, it is important to also consider their drawbacks.
One potential negative point is the price difference between the two optics. The Pulsar Thermion XM50 comes with a higher price tag compared to the ATN ThOR 4, which may be a limiting factor for budget-conscious consumers.
Another aspect to consider is the warranty and customer support from each manufacturer. It is essential to research and ensure that you are comfortable with the level of support offered by the respective companies.
When making a purchasing decision, it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the specifications, features, and price points of both optics to determine which one best meets your specific needs and preferences.
To provide a more in-depth comparison, we have included sample footage showcasing the performance of the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 in various scenarios.
In this comparison, we evaluate the accuracy and ease of zeroing with both optics. The footage showcases the clarity of the reticles, the ease of making adjustments, and the overall user experience when zeroing a scope.
For those interested in long-range shooting or observation, this footage demonstrates the capabilities of both optics at extended distances. The quality of the image, clarity of details, and the ability to distinguish targets can be compared to assess the optics’ suitability for long-range use.
Use in Different Environmental Conditions
Thermal optics need to perform well in different environmental conditions, such as low light, fog, or extreme temperatures. The comparison footage explores how the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 respond to various environmental factors, providing insights into their performance and reliability in different scenarios.
One important consideration when choosing a thermal optic is the display resolution. The ATN ThOR 4 boasts a higher display resolution compared to the Pulsar Thermion XM50. Higher display resolution often translates to clearer and more detailed images, allowing for better target identification and overall observation.
The ATN ThOR 4 offers a higher resolution display, providing users with a more immersive and detailed viewing experience. This can be especially beneficial when trying to spot targets or identify specific details at longer ranges.
In this comprehensive comparison, we have explored various aspects of the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 thermal optics. Both optics offer impressive features and capabilities, including customizable reticles, video recording, and compatibility with different firearms. The ATN ThOR 4 excels in battery life and display resolution, offering an extended runtime and a higher resolution display. On the other hand, the Pulsar Thermion XM50 stands out with its sleek design and IP67 weather resistance.
Ultimately, the choice between the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 comes down to personal preferences, specific needs, and budget considerations. Whether you prioritize extended battery life, higher display resolution, or a more traditional design, both optics provide excellent options for thermal imaging enthusiasts and outdoor adventurers alike.